wow even just asking it for 80% of the way to ASD-STE100 makes a huge difference in readability. I'm experiencing way less brain fog trying to read opus.
datadrivenangel 35 minutes ago [-]
ISO 24495-1 is the way for technical writing.
cadamsdotcom 2 hours ago [-]
Very cool, thanks for this! Looks super useful for all kinds of copy..
Am I crazy or does the skill itself look like slop, complete with disclaimers back to the user embedded into the skill file itself?
"A warning about the original post. It came with an overview graphic of STE. A later fact check found errors in that graphic. For example, "approximately" is an approved word, and the dictionary has no entry for "in order to". This skill follows the rules of Issue 9, not the graphic."
grey-area 13 minutes ago [-]
Yes it absolutely is slop, full of AI tells. Why do we need all this ridiculous ceremony for a text file of instructions anyway?
If I want to control how it writes I just put a style_guide.md in the context.
whattheheckheck 4 hours ago [-]
Should look into tropes.fyi
ranger_danger 4 minutes ago [-]
How do people even find things like this, I haven't seen it anywhere
[0] https://github.com/AminBlg/SimpleEnglish
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49114639
Wonder if it also defeats text watermarking.
"A warning about the original post. It came with an overview graphic of STE. A later fact check found errors in that graphic. For example, "approximately" is an approved word, and the dictionary has no entry for "in order to". This skill follows the rules of Issue 9, not the graphic."
If I want to control how it writes I just put a style_guide.md in the context.